|
|
|
 |
 |
Produksjon,
ikke workshop-prosess!
I et åpent brev til Det Åpne Teater hevder Stephen Hutton at teatrets
workshop-prosess ikke gagner hverken dramatikere, publikum eller teatersjefer. Selv om
denne arbeidsformen var viktig i en oppbyggende fase for Det Åpne Teater, bør nå
teatret komme videre, hevder han.
Her følger Stephen Huttons brev i sin helhet:Dear Åpne teater,
Thank you for this weeks guest performance from the Traverse Theatre in Scotland.
("Gagarin Way" by Gregory Burke, 15/16 October). It was an exciting, political,
emotional, character driven, world play! I was saddened to be in an audience of between
thirty and forty people in an auditorium for over two hundred for such an important drama.
As a writer it reminded me, that in order to write such a good play with such
international consequences you have to tell the story from a local perspective.
Dear, dear Åpne Teater, You are the most important Theatre in all of Oslo. I
love you. And yet as a local writer you seem distant and closed to me. You are always
away, doing good work, no doubt, networking and collaborating internationally, but at the
cost of producing local work, building a local tradition of new writing.
In your autumn programme you printed why you develop texts exclusively via a workshop
process, and therein lies my problem with you. The workshop development programme was an
excellent way to found and begin Det Åpne Teater. But is it not now time for phase two?
To my mind we need what the Traverse Theatre has. It produces plays. Since 1963, over 600
plays. That is an average of 15.4 plays produced each and every year.
It is adamant that it only produces local Scottish plays.
After all writing is a local tradition.
Yet no-one is producing plays on an constant accessible basis in Oslo at the moment. There
is a famine of new writing.
The workshop process Det Åpne teater offers fails me as a writer, as all it can offer me
is helpful constructive criticism. The real truth is with an audience. A production can
tell me more in an instant than anyone can. It also offers me a goal. And everyone who
writes, knows writing is a goal related business.
The workshop process fails the public, as they cannot participate. And new writing is thus
disappearing in their memory as something they do. At this point the public almost doesn't
go to the theatre. They certainly won't go to new writing, unless we do something.
The workshop process fails me as a theatre director, because the aim of such a process is
an eternal mystery. And I have often observed my fellow directing colleagues pass time in
such a process without any aim being realised.
We need productions of plays.
I know Det Åpne has no production budget, but neither did the Travese theatre. Indeed
it's programme which I bought at the performance at Dåt this week, talks of 'maverick
enthusiasm' which saw it through the seventies and eighties on partial or no financial
support.
We need many small scale plays so that the public is again awakened to new writing.
We need plays so that writers again have a forum where there work is reflected, not filed.
We need productions because there is now in Norway a freelance culture of unemployed
actors and directors.
We need plays, because you love new writing. Don't you Åpne Teater?
Could not all parties who are interested in producing a season (5 plays?) of new Norwegian
writing, an easily recognisable and accessible product to the public, come together at Det
Åpne Teater and discuss ways in which we could begin and sustain a local tradition of new
writing, which in time will have far reaching international consequences?
The future of new writing is in production.
Stephen Hutton
DEBATT
Teaternett formidler
nyheter fra norsk og internasjonalt teater. Hjelp oss å være oppdatert! Skjer det noe
der du er - send oss et tips! Vår epostadresse: teaternett@teaternett.no |
|